|
|||||||
Subsumption |
|||||||
| Key figures: | Karl Marx, Antonio Negri, Guy Debord | ||||||
The concepts of formal and real subsumption date back to Marx’s theorisations of the historical emergence of absolute and relative surplus value, produced as an appendix to Capital Volume 1. Subsumption is used to describe a real process within social relations where an element previously exterior or autonomous is integrated into a new cycle of reproduction in relation to a different determination of power. One might compare it to an idea like Aufhebung where the other is preserved in a succession; when something is subsumed on the other hand, it does not necessarily retain any autonomy - it is overcome. Hence in Marx, subsumption refers to the historical processes whereby the wage-labour relation becomes generalised. Total subsumption is a more modern rendering, used extensively by Antonio Negri and others, to describe the full interiorisation of social relations to capital. Drawing on Marx, the economy is understood to have fully colonised the sphere of social production. This theme is strongly present too in the work of Guy Debord. The premise of the society of the spectacle is exactly such a victory of the Bourgeoisie’s economic power. For Negri, total subsumption coincides with a new form of productivity, the social force of the multitude, whose subjectivity includes extensive affective labour and reproductive networks, not directly the result of capital, yet serving the needs of society where capital is dominant form of production. With Debord, the subsumption of society by the capitalist economy, is the basis of the spectacular universe, the real illusions which form a social relationship between individuals mediated by images (Thesis 4 Society of The Spectacle). |
|||||||